Painting to See

Painting to See

Share this post

Painting to See
Painting to See
Sitting or Standing?

Sitting or Standing?

Aug 18, 2024
∙ Paid
6

Share this post

Painting to See
Painting to See
Sitting or Standing?
2
Share
Aston Knight painting in a stream, circa 1900. Charles Scribner's Sons Art Reference Department records, 1839-1962. Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution.

Among plein air painters, the question to sit or stand often comes up.

The argument for standing is that it's easier for the painter to step back once in a while to get some distance on the painting. Problems with design can be seen more easily a few paces back, as well as issues with drawing, value and color. Sitting comfortably on a stool or in a chair, inches away from the work surface, the painter tends to focus on smaller things. The painting can rapidly descend into the realm of hyperrealism with too much detail. Sure, you can get up—but it can be difficult to extricate yourself without knocking over the easel.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Painting to See to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Michael Chesley Johnson
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share